AI Toolkit

Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs GPT-4o

Which AI is best for coding in 2026? Compare Claude Sonnet and GPT-4o on benchmarks, pricing, IDE integration, and real-world developer workflows.

Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 4.6

Professional software development and code review

Pricing (per 1M tokens)

Input$3
Output$15
Context Window200K

Key Strengths

  • Highest scores on SWE-bench and coding benchmarks
  • Claude Code CLI for agentic software engineering
  • Excellent at understanding complex codebases
OpenAI
GPT-4o

Full-stack development and IDE-integrated workflows

Pricing (per 1M tokens)

Input$5
Output$15
Context Window128K

Key Strengths

  • Strong coding across all major languages
  • GitHub Copilot integration
  • Good at explaining code and teaching concepts
Our Verdict

Claude Sonnet leads the coding benchmarks in 2026 and offers the best pure code generation quality, especially for complex software engineering tasks. GPT-4o is a strong alternative with its Copilot integration and broader IDE ecosystem. Most professional developers will prefer Claude Sonnet; teams already invested in GitHub Copilot may prefer sticking with GPT-4o.

Quick Comparison

FeatureClaude Sonnet 4.6GPT-4o
ProviderAnthropicOpenAI
Input Price / 1M tokens$3$5
Output Price / 1M tokens$15$15
Context Window200K128K
Best ForProfessional software development and code reviewFull-stack development and IDE-integrated workflows

Related Comparisons

Need Help Choosing the Right AI?

We help UK businesses integrate AI tools into their workflows. From model selection to full automation builds — we can help.

Disclaimer: Prices and features current as of February 2026. Check provider websites for latest pricing. Actual costs may vary based on usage tier, commitment discounts, and regional availability.