AI Toolkit

Claude Opus 4.6 vs ChatGPT (GPT-4o)

Which AI writes best in 2026? Compare Claude and ChatGPT for long-form content, creative writing, marketing copy, and professional documents.

Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.6

Long-form articles, reports, and professional content

Pricing (per 1M tokens)

Input$15
Output$75
Context Window200K

Key Strengths

  • Most natural, human-like writing quality
  • Excellent at matching tone and style
  • Handles long-form content with consistency
OpenAI
ChatGPT (GPT-4o)

Creative content, marketing copy, and brainstorming

Pricing (per 1M tokens)

Input$5
Output$15
Context Window128K

Key Strengths

  • Great for brainstorming and creative writing
  • Strong at adapting to diverse writing formats
  • Custom GPTs for specialised writing workflows
Our Verdict

Claude Opus produces the most natural, human-like writing and excels at long-form content that requires consistency and nuance. ChatGPT is better for brainstorming, quick creative drafts, and marketing copy with its Custom GPT workflows. For professional writing quality, Claude is the clear winner; for creative ideation and rapid iteration, ChatGPT edges ahead.

Quick Comparison

FeatureClaude Opus 4.6ChatGPT (GPT-4o)
ProviderAnthropicOpenAI
Input Price / 1M tokens$15$5
Output Price / 1M tokens$75$15
Context Window200K128K
Best ForLong-form articles, reports, and professional contentCreative content, marketing copy, and brainstorming

Related Comparisons

Need Help Choosing the Right AI?

We help UK businesses integrate AI tools into their workflows. From model selection to full automation builds — we can help.

Disclaimer: Prices and features current as of February 2026. Check provider websites for latest pricing. Actual costs may vary based on usage tier, commitment discounts, and regional availability.