ChatGPT (GPT-4o) vs Llama 3.3 70B
ChatGPT vs Llama 3.3 compared. Commercial AI vs open-source — pricing, data privacy, self-hosting, and which approach suits your needs in 2026.
Teams wanting a ready-to-use AI without setup overhead
Pricing (per 1M tokens)
Key Strengths
- No infrastructure needed — works instantly
- Polished user experience with plugins
- Consistent updates and new features from OpenAI
ChatGPT is the easier, more polished option — sign up and start using it immediately with no infrastructure. Llama is free but requires GPU servers to self-host. Choose ChatGPT for convenience and breadth of features; choose Llama if you need full data control, custom fine-tuning, or want to eliminate per-token costs at scale.
Quick Comparison
| Feature | ChatGPT (GPT-4o) | Llama 3.3 70B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Meta |
| Input Price / 1M tokens | $5 | Free |
| Output Price / 1M tokens | $15 | Free |
| Context Window | 128K | 128K |
| Best For | Teams wanting a ready-to-use AI without setup overhead | On-premise deployments, data privacy, and custom AI models |
Related Comparisons
Compare ChatGPT and Claude side by side. Pricing, context windows, strengths, and real-world use cases. Find out which AI model is right for you in 2026.
ChatGPT vs Gemini head-to-head comparison. Compare pricing, context windows, features, and which AI is best for your needs in 2026.
Claude vs Gemini compared. See how Anthropic and Google's top AI models stack up on pricing, context window, reasoning, and real-world use cases.
GPT-4o vs Claude Sonnet 4.6 head-to-head. Compare pricing, coding performance, context windows, and which model is better for developers in 2026.
Need Help Choosing the Right AI?
We help UK businesses integrate AI tools into their workflows. From model selection to full automation builds — we can help.
Disclaimer: Prices and features current as of February 2026. Check provider websites for latest pricing. Actual costs may vary based on usage tier, commitment discounts, and regional availability.